4.8 Article

Graphene oxide/gold nanoparticle/graphite fiber microelectrodes for directing electron transfer of glucose oxidase and glucose detection

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 521, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230956

关键词

Graphite fiber; Graphene oxide; Gold nanoparticles; Glucose oxidase; Sensing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51403113, 52072193]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2019YQ19, ZR2019BEM018]
  3. Project of Shandong Province Higher EducationalScience and Technology Program [2019KJA026]
  4. Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Shandong Province [ZR2021JQ16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates a promising electrochemical sensor with GO/AuNP-modified electrodes to improve charge transport and sensitivity for glucose detection. The sensor shows a linear response and low detection limit, with good selectivity for other interfering molecules.
A promising electrochemical sensor is investigated using graphene oxide (GO)/gold nanoparticle (AuNP)modified graphite electrodes to enhance charge transport in electrochemical biosensors and increase the sensitivity for glucose detection. An efficient charge transfer pathway is formed by interconnected GO nanosheets and AuNP along the graphite fiber (GF) electrode (GFE). The positive GO can adsorb glucose oxidase (GOD) by electrostatic attraction. The detected response current of the sensor is linearly related to the glucose concentration within a detection limit of 1.2 mu M. Furthermore, this glucose sensor has high stability, good reproducibility and excellent selectivity for various oxidizable molecules such as dopamine (DA), uric acid (UA), ascorbic acid (AA) and other molecules causing chaff interference (fructose, lactose and galactose). It is worth noting that this work shows a new method using covalent bonds and self-assembly on the surface of GF for fabricating excellent electrochemical glucose biosensors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据