4.8 Article

Structural stability of catalyst ink and its effects on the catalyst layer microstructure and fuel cell performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 517, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230698

关键词

Proton exchange membrane fuel cell; Short-side-chain perfluorosulfonic acid; ionomer; Catalyst ink; Structural stability; Ionomer distribution

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1502503]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA21090101]
  3. LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1902079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study suggests that catalyst inks containing long-side-chain ionomers show better structural stability after storage compared to those containing short-side-chain ionomers, making it easier to regain initial ink properties.
At present, the further development of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) is in urgent need of commercialization. Therein, the storage of catalyst ink is a neglected but crucial topic. Undoubtedly, a structurally stable catalyst ink is more resistant to storage and suitable for commercialization. In this work, the structural stability of catalyst inks containing short-side-chain (SSC) ionomer and long-side-chain (LSC) ionomer after storage and their effects on the catalyst layer (CL) microstructure and the cell performance are investigated. The result demonstrates that the catalyst ink with LSC ionomer has better structural stability than the catalyst ink with SSC ionomer. The adsorbed ionomers on Pt/C in SSC ionomer catalyst ink increase after ink storage, resulting in increased ionomer coverage and deteriorated ionomer distribution in the CL, which makes the cell subject to higher mass transport resistance. As a result, the LSC ionomer catalyst ink after storage can achieve the initial ink properties after redispersion, while the SSC ionomer catalyst ink fails. Therefore, to promote the practical application of SSC ionomer, the ink storage should be considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据