4.5 Article

Integrating sedimentology and ichnology with rock typing and flow units: Implications for clastic reservoir characterization

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109628

关键词

Sedimentology; Ichnology; Pore throat radii; Storage-flow capacity; Reservoir

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The challenge of predicting, correlating, distributing, determining thickness, and quality of shallow marine elastic reservoir facies persists. This study integrates sedimentology, ichnology, reservoir rock typing, and flow units to characterize the Lower Cretaceous Wabiskaw Member reservoir. Analysis of the reservoir characteristics highlights F-4 as the most productive reservoir facies in the study area, showcasing the effectiveness of a geological model for assessing reservoir quality based on detailed facies and wireline analyses.
Shallow marine elastic reservoir facies prediction, correlation, distribution, thickness, and quality remains a challenge. This study integrates sedimentology and ichnology with reservoir rock typing and flow units to characterize the Lower Cretaceous Wabiskaw Member reservoir. An integrated geologic depositional model is presented using sedimentological data (rock types, sedimentary structures, grain size), ichnological data (trace fossils intensity, size, diversity), reservoir characteristics (porosity, permeability), and well log data. The Wabiskaw Member strata are characterized using four facies associations (composed of nine sedimentary facies). Facies association 1 (FA-1) comprises dark grey to blue-grey mudstone with a distinctly lenticular appearance (Facies 1, 2). Ichnologically, a stressed archetypal Cruziana Ichnofacies represent FA-1. Facies association 2 (FA2) is fine-lower medium-grained sandstone with thin mudstone interbeds (Facies 3, 4). A stressed ichnological suite of mixed Skolithos-Cruziana Ichnofacies is present in FA-2. Facies association 3 (FA-3) is dark grey to bluish-grey mudstone with minor sandstone interbeds (Facies 5, 6). Trace fossils of archetypal Cruziana Ichnofacies are present in FA-3. Facies association 4 (FA-4) comprises upper fine to lower fine glauconitic sandstone (Facies 7, 8, 9) with a high-density trace fossil assemblage. FA-1 and FA-2 represent deposition in a waveinfluenced prodelta to delta front settings, whereas FA-3 and FA-4 represent deposition in the offshoreshoreface environment. The reservoir quality of various reservoir facies (F-3, F-4, F-7, F-8) is evaluated by comparing facies reservoir characteristics (porosity, permeability, pore throat radii, flow-storage capacity, oil saturation, and thickness). F-4 is the best and most productive reservoir (pore throat radius >20 mu m, 18% flow, and 4% storage capacity) in the study area. F-7 is ranked second-best in reservoir quality based on petrophysical characteristics (pore throat radius between 10 and 20 mu m, 36% storage 47% flow capacity). F-8 is ranked third in reservoir quality with pore-throat radii ranging from 4 to 10 mu m (mesoporous), 23% storage, and <= 5% flow capacity. F-3 is ranked last amongst the Wabiskaw Member reservoir facies. It is micro-porous (pore-throat radii ranging from 2 to 4 mu m) with 37% storage and <= 5% capacity flow. The reservoir characteristics are effectively constrained by the range of values recorded within each facies, demonstrating that a geological model (based upon detailed facies and wireline analyses) allows assessing how lateral facies changes affect the reservoir quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据