4.7 Article

Zanamivir-Cholesterol Conjugate: A Long-Acting Neuraminidase Inhibitor with Potent Efficacy against Drug-Resistant Influenza Viruses

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 64, 期 23, 页码 17403-17412

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01531

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91953116, 31770862 21778074, 81661148055]
  2. National Science & Technology Major Project of China [2018ZX09711002001-007]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFE0205800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conjugation of cholesterol to ZNV shows improved antiviral efficacy and can effectively protect mice from influenza virus infection. This new treatment has the potential for sustained therapeutic effects and provides an effective strategy for improving the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of other small-molecule therapeutics.
Antiviral therapy of influenza virus infections depends heavily on two viral neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors, oseltamivir (OSV) and zanamivir (ZNV). The efficacy of OSV is challenged by the development of viral resistance, while the clinical use of ZNV is limited by its poor pharmacokinetic profile and requirement for twice-daily intranasal administration. We have developed a novel NA inhibitor by conjugating ZNV to cholesterol. The ZNV-cholesterol conjugate showed markedly improved antiviral efficacy and plasma half-life compared with ZNV. Single-dose administration of the conjugate protected the mice from lethal challenges with wild-type or mutant H1N1 influenza viruses bearing an OSV-resistant H275Y-substitution. Mechanistic studies showed that the conjugate targeted the cell membrane and entered the host cells, thereby inhibiting the NA function and the assembly of progeny virions. The ZNV-cholesterol conjugate represents a potential new treatment for influenza infections with sustained effect. Cholesterol conjugation may be an effective strategy for improving the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of other small-molecule therapeutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据