Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019
出版年份 2021 全文链接
标题
Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019
作者
关键词
Evidence-Based Practice, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, Cochrane Review, Trends, Reporting
出版物
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages 1-11
出版商
Elsevier BV
发表日期
2021-06-05
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.022
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Why do you need a biostatistician?
- (2020) Antonia Zapf et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Evidence synthesis for tackling research waste
- (2020) Matthew J. Grainger et al. Nature Ecology & Evolution
- A new ecosystem for evidence synthesis
- (2020) Shinichi Nakagawa et al. Nature Ecology & Evolution
- Assessment of Publication Trends of Systematic Reviews and Randomized Clinical Trials, 1995 to 2017
- (2019) Joshua D. Niforatos et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Meta-analysis Metastasis
- (2019) Joshua D. Wallach JAMA Internal Medicine
- Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks
- (2019) Marina Krnic Martinic et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences
- (2018) Zachary Munn et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer
- (2018) Marius Goldkuhle et al. BMJ Open
- Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer’s disease before and after PRISMA introduction
- (2018) Xiao Sun et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Overview of Systematic Reviews of Non–Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation
- (2018) Ioannis Doundoulakis et al.
- Overlapping network meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies
- (2017) F Naudet et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar
- (2017) Jinhui Tian et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Reporting completeness and transparency of meta-analyses of depression screening tool accuracy: A comparison of meta-analyses published before and after the PRISMA statement
- (2016) Danielle B. Rice et al. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
- Mass Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: An Exercise in Mega-silliness?
- (2016) MATTHEW J. PAGE et al. MILBANK QUARTERLY
- The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
- (2016) JOHN P.A. IOANNIDIS MILBANK QUARTERLY
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
- (2016) Matthew J. Page et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- The Rise in Meta-analyses from China
- (2013) Xiao-Fei Ye et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies
- (2013) K. C. Siontis et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?
- (2012) P. S. Fleming et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS
- Meta-analysis is victim to Chinese academic and educational systems
- (2012) Zhi-Ping Yang et al. JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
- (2010) Hilda Bastian et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Honorary Coauthorship: Does It Matter?
- (2009) Jeremy O'Brien et al. CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started