4.7 Article

Quasi-Sliding Mode Control With Orthogonal Endocrine Neural Network-Based Estimator Applied in Anti-Lock Braking System

期刊

IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 754-764

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2015.2492682

关键词

Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system; anti-lock braking system; endocrine neural networks; estimation of modeling error; orthogonal functions; sliding mode control

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia [TR 35005, III 44006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a new control method for nonlinear discrete-time systems, described by an input-output model which is based on a combination of quasi-sliding mode and neural networks. First, an input-output discrete-time quasi-sliding mode control with inserted digital integrator, which additionally reduces chattering, is described. Due to the presence of various nonlinearities and uncertainties, the model of the controlled object cannot be described adequately enough. These imperfections in modeling cause amodeling error, resulting in rather poor system performances. In order to increase the steady-state accuracy, an estimated value of the modeling error in the next sampling period is implemented into the control law. For this purpose, we propose two improved structures of the neural networks by implementing the generalized quasi-orthogonal functions of Legendre type. These functions have already been proven as an effective tool for the signal approximation, as well as for modeling, identification, analysis, synthesis, and simulation of dynamical systems. Finally, the proposed method is verified through digital simulations and real-time experiments on an anti-lock braking system as a representative of the considered class of mechatronic systems, in a laboratory environment. A detailed analysis of the obtained results confirms the effectiveness of the proposed approach in terms of better steady-state performances.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据