4.6 Article

Intellectual-disability-associated mutations in the ceramide transport protein gene CERT1 lead to aberrant function and subcellular distribution

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 297, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101338

关键词

-

资金

  1. MEXT KAKENHI [JP17H06417]
  2. AMED-CREST [JP20gm0910005j0006, 19J01972]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic mutations in CERT1 may lead to intellectual disability by affecting sphingolipid metabolism and neural development, resulting in abnormal brain function.
The lipid molecule ceramide is transported from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus for sphingomyelin production via the ceramide transport protein (CERT), encoded by CERT1. Hyperphosphorylation of CERT's serine-repeat motif (SRM) decreases its functionality. Some forms of inherited intellectual disability (ID) have been associated with a serine-to-leucine substitution in the SRM (S132L mutation) and a glycine-to-arginine substitution outside the SRM (G243R mutation) in CERT; however, it is unclear if mutations outside the SRM disrupt the control of CERT functionality. In the current investigation, we identified a new CERT1 variant (dupAA) in a patient with mild ID that resulted from a frameshift at the C-terminus of CERT1. However, familial analysis revealed that the dupAA variant was not associated with ID, allowing us to utilize it as a disease-matched negative control for CERT1 variants that are associated with ID. Biochemical analysis showed that G243R and S132L, but not dupAA, impair SRM hyperphosphorylation and render the CERT variants excessively active. Additionally, both S132L and G243R mutations but not dupAA caused the proteins to be distributed in a punctate subcellular manner. On the basis of these findings, we infer that the majority of ID-associated CERT variants may impair SRM phosphorylation-dependent repression, resulting in an increase in sphingomyelin production concurrent with CERT subcellular redistribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据