4.7 Article

Multiscale modeling of discontinuous dynamic recrystallization during hot working by coupling multilevel cellular automaton and finite element method

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.103064

关键词

Microstructures; Thermomechanical processes; Metallic material; Probability and statistics; Multilevel cellular automaton

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51705316, U2037204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed a multiscale modeling framework, the MCAFE-dDRX model, to evaluate the dDRX microstructure evolution during hot working processes, facilitating the prediction of microstructure evolution during heterogeneous and non-isothermal deformation of materials.
Discontinuous dynamic recrystallization (dDRX) is considered an effective way to obtain fine grain microstructures during hot working of materials with low-to-medium stacking fault energy (SFE). However, to date, investigation and modeling of dDRX in complex hot working processes are not appropriately performed, which hinders further control of the microstructure and forming quality of products during hot working. In this study, a multiscale modeling framework, namely the MCAFE-dDRX model, was constructed by coupling the multilevel cellular automaton (MCA) and finite element (FE) method. The data acquired via the FE method was used as an input for MCA simulation by discretizing the increment in FE time to consider the deformation history of materials. Compared to previous studies where only the effects of constant strain rate and temperature on the deformation of materials are analysed, the MCAFE-dDRX model can evaluate the dDRX microstructure evolution at different Zener-Hollomon levels, which has been validated by hot extrusion in this study. The developed simulation framework facilitates the prediction of microstructure evolution during heterogeneous and non-isothermal deformation of materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据