4.7 Article

Prediction of heat transfer distribution induced by the variation in vertical location of circular cylinder on Rayleigh-Benard convection using artificial neural network

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106701

关键词

Rayleigh-Benard convection; Vertical distance; Heat transfer performance; Irreversibility; Artificial neural network; Supervised learning algorithm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the flow and thermal fields of Rayleigh-Benard convection in a rectangular channel with an internal circular cylinder, analyzing the parameters and characteristics that influence the flow and thermal behavior within the channel.
The present study investigates the flow and thermal fields of Rayleigh-Benard convection (RBC) in a rectangular channel with an internal circular cylinder. The parameters considered are Rayleigh number (10(4) <= Ra <= 10(6) ), Prandtl number (Pr = 0.7), and irreversibility distribution ratio (phi = 1). The vertical distance (delta) in the range of -0.2 <= delta <= 0.2 is the major simulation parameter in present study. The results are analyzed based on the iso-surface of temperature, vortical structure with orthogonal enstrophy distribution, and entropy generations. Additionally, Nusselt number ( Nu ) and Bejan number ( Be ) are obtained to analyze the heat transfer characteristics and irreversibility, respectively. The Rayleigh number and the vertical distance significantly influence the flow and thermal characteristics within the channel. Besides, an artificial neural network (ANN) model is used to predict the distribution of local Nusselt number. The performance of present ANN model is evaluated by comparing the tendency and quantitative values with the direct numerical simulation (DNS) results. The results show that the ANN model used in this study can precisely predict the correlation between the input parameters and output parameter with lesser computational time and cost compared to the DNS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据