4.3 Article

A new ion funnel for improving the transmission of low mass ions

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2021.116702

关键词

Mass spectrometry; Ion funnel; Low mass to charge ratio; Ion transmission

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61971248]
  2. Science and Technology Major Project of Ningbo [2018B10075]
  3. Zhejiang Key Project of China [2020C03064]
  4. K.C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated a new ion funnel with a quadrupolar electrode configuration to improve the transmission efficiency of low mass ions. By rotating the RF and suppressing axial potential wells, the new ion funnel design showed a 10% increase in transmission efficiency for ions with mass-to-charge ratios below 70 compared to conventional ion funnels.
To solve the problem of low mass ion discrimination of conventional ion funnel and optimize ion transmission, a new ion funnel with a quadrupolar electrode configuration, was evaluated, based on the theoretical modeling, in this paper. The theoretical model was constructed by using the SIMION and the performance characteristics of the new ion funnel was simulated systematically by calculating the ion trajectory under different operating conditions. As the low mass ions lossed at the exit of ion funnel was mainly due to the opposite phase radio frequency (RF) voltage applied to the front and rear electrodes, the new ion funnel configuration rotated RF by 90 degrees and suppressed the axial potential wells near the ion funnel exit. The transmission efficiencies of the conventional and the new ion funnels for ions with low mass to charge ratio (m/z) were compared under the same operating conditions. The results showed that the new ion funnel configuration could improve the transmission efficiency by about 10% as compared to the conventional ion funnel in the m/z range below 70 while there was little differences in the transmission efficiency for high m/z ions. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据