4.7 Article

Investigation on the spreading and solidification of supercooled gallium droplets during impact

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.122142

关键词

Supercooling; Gallium; Droplet impact; Spreading; Solidification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Founda-tion of China [31770107, 21874116]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study observed the impact process of supercooled gallium droplets and analyzed the influence of dimensionless parameters, substrate materials, and substrate temperatures on the spreading and solidification of the droplets. It was found that the supercooled gallium droplets slightly retracted and were likely to solidify during impact, with the maximum spreading factor proportional to We(1/2). Substrate material and temperature had minor effects on the maximum spreading factor but significantly influenced the solidification of the droplets.
The spreading and solidification of supercooled gallium droplets during impact affects the application of gallium-based liquid metals during 3D printing and spray coating. In this study, the impact process of supercooled gallium droplets was observed, and the influence of the dimensionless parameters, substrate materials, and substrate temperatures on the spreading and solidification of supercooled gallium droplets was analyzed. It was observed that the supercooled gallium droplets retracted slightly during the impact process and were likely to undergo solidification due to impact. The maximum spreading factor of the supercooled gallium droplet during impact was proportional to We(1/2) (square root of the Weber number). The substrate material and substrate temperature less affected the maximum spreading factor, whereas they have a significant effect in determining whether the droplets solidify. The guidelines controlling the maximum spreading factor and the solidification of supercooled gallium droplets have been outlined in this study. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据