4.7 Article

Experimental investigation on minimum film boiling temperature during reflooding in multi-rectangular narrow channels

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121635

关键词

Reflooding; Minimum film boiling temperature; Experiment; Nuclear reactor; Rectangular narrow channel

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U2067210]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the minimum film boiling temperature (T-min) and quench velocity in multi-rectangular narrow channels through a bottom reflooding experiment. The study analyzes the effects of working conditions on T-min and quench velocity, and proposes a prediction model for T-min during reflooding in rectangular narrow channels.
Determination of minimum film boiling temperature (T-min) is significant in the nuclear reactor safety analysis. T-min represents the start of quenching which is vital to mitigate the severity of the accident. In this paper, a bottom reflooding experiment is carried out to investigate T-min and quench velocity in multi-rectangular narrow channels. Effects of working conditions, including inlet subcooling, reflooding velocity, initial wall temperature, and system pressure on T-min and quench velocity, are analyzed in detail. It is found that T-min and quench velocity distinctly increases with the increase of subcooling, system pressure, and reflooding velocity. However, the effect of reflooding velocity on T-min and quench velocity is mild when the reflooding velocity is relatively high. T-min increases with the increase of initial wall temperature, while quench velocity drops. T-min at the upper position of the heating wall is lower than that at the lower position because the water subcooling changes when flowing along the heating channel. A prediction model of T-min during reflooding in rectangular narrow channel is proposed, and very good agreement is achieved comparing with experimental data with +/- 10% uncertainty. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据