4.6 Article

Analysis of Electrode Configuration Effects on Mass Transfer and Organic Redox Flow Battery Performance

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 7, 页码 2915-2925

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04689

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51906012]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [BUCTRC201922]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study establishes a three-dimensional numerical model for organic redox flow batteries (ORFBs) and investigates the influence of different electrode configurations on battery performance. The results show that the sector electrode has the best mass transfer and battery performance, followed by the trapezoidal electrode. The optimal parameters for the rectangular and trapezoidal electrodes are also determined.
For organic redox flow batteries (ORFBs), it is of significance to clarify the influence mechanism of their electrode configuration on the mass transfer inside electrodes and battery performance. A novel three-dimensional (3D) numerical model for ORFBs is established based on the Nernst-Planck and Butler-Volmer theories and is verified by numerous experiments for both the charge and discharge processes. ORFBs equipped with rectangular, trapezoidal, and sector electrodes are investigated, in which the voltage, overpotentials, uniformity factor, and the power efficiency of the discharge process are presented. The results show that the sector electrode possesses the best mass transfer and battery performance. The power-based efficiency of the sector electrode is 1% higher than that of the trapezoidal one. In addition, the opening angle of the sector electrode should be as small as possible. The optimal aspect ratio of the rectangular electrode is 60:107, and the optimal configuration of the trapezoidal electrode is 30 mm top side length and 130 mm bottom side length. The optimization of the porous electrode configuration is presented, which can contribute to the commercial application of ORFBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据