4.8 Article

Choline hydroxide based deep eutectic solvent for dissolving cellulose

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 2464-2475

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1gc04130d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51873219]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project [2020YFC1910301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cellulose solvent based on choline hydroxide/urea deep eutectic solvent (DES) has promising solubility for cellulose, high tolerance to water, and wide temperature range. It can be used as a green solvent platform for preparing regenerated cellulose materials and conducting cellulose chemistry experiments.
New cellulose solvent based on choline hydroxide/urea (ChOH/Ur) deep eutectic solvent (DES) was developed. The ChOH/Ur DES has a promising solubility for cellulose compared to ChCl-based DESs. ChOH/Ur DES with ca. 11 wt% water can dissolve at least 9.5 wt% cellulose with the degree of polymerization (DP) of 926 within 30 min. Compared to the ionic liquids, the temperature window of ChOH/Ur is wide and close to room temperature. The ChOH/Ur DES also showed more tolerance to water than ionic liquid, which can save energy in preparation and usage. The physical and chemical properties of DES and cellulose solution were investigated. The ChOH/Ur DES system is a non-derivatizing solvent for cellulose. The preliminary rheological results suggest that the dynamics of cellulose solution in ChOH/Ur system is similar to that of salt-free polyelectrolyte solutions. The degradation of cellulose during the dissolution and storage of the cellulose solution is limited. After 7 days of storage at 40 degrees C, the DP of the regenerated cellulose remained at about 80% of the raw material. The ChOH/Ur is recyclable without the loss of solubility of cellulose. In conclusion, the ChOH/Ur DES system is a promising green solvent platform for preparing regenerated cellulose materials and could be used as a media for cellulose chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据