4.7 Article

Aqueous phase reforming of biodiesel byproduct glycerol over mesoporous Ni-Cu/CeO2 for renewable hydrogen production

期刊

FUEL
卷 308, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122014

关键词

Hydrogen production; Aqueous phase reforming of biodiesel byproduct glycerol; Mesoporous Ni-Cu/CeO2 catalyst; In-situ CO2 capture

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [:51876130]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai outstanding academic leaders plan [21XD1402400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully synthesized a Ni-Cu bimetallic catalyst supported on CeO2, which can effectively increase the H-2 production rate and inhibit methane formation in aqueous phase reforming. Furthermore, the addition of CaO can reduce the activation energy, improve the water-gas shift reaction, and decrease methane production.
Aqueous phase reforming (APR), regarded as one method for inexpensive H-2 production, was widely studied due to lower temperature and unnecessary to vaporize water and fuels. In this study, the mesoporous CeO2, regarded as a metal oxide carrier, was first prepared by colloidal solution combustion, and then the Ni-Cu bimetallic supported on mesoporous CeO2 was successfully synthesized to investigate the catalytic performance in APR of biodiesel byproduct glycerol. The results show that the Cu element in the catalysts can effectively improve water-gas shift (WGS) reaction and inhibit the formation of methane, which increases the H-2 production rate from 125.08 to 195.57 mu mol.min(-1).g cat(-1). The higher reaction temperature is beneficial to the H-2 production rate, but not to H-2 selectivity. Kinetics analysis indicates that catalyst of 1Ni2Cu/CeO2 + 0.2gCaO has the lowest apparent activation energy (29.86 kJ.mol(-1)). CaO is introduced as an absorbent to improve WGS reaction and reduce methanation reactions through in-situ CO2 removal and capture. The reaction path and mechanism of APR of glycerol are also discussed in this paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据