4.7 Article

Reported evidence of vitamin E protection against cataract and glaucoma

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 100-119

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.10.027

关键词

Vitamin E; Age-related cataract; Glaucoma; Pseudo-exfoliation syndrome; Antioxidants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vitamin E may potentially prevent or ameliorate cataracts and glaucoma by reducing oxidative stress, with some studies showing positive effects in humans. However, the effects of vitamin E on the development and progression of these eye diseases are inconsistent and require further randomized control studies for validation.
Cataract and glaucoma are the major causes of severe visual loss and blindness in older adults. This review article describes the currently available basic and clinical evidence regarding vitamin E protection against these eye diseases in the chronologic order of the publications. Experimental evidence has suggested both that oxidative stress due to the accumulation of free radicals plays a role in the pathogenesis of cataracts and glaucoma and that the process can be prevented or ameliorated by vitamin E. The results of observational studies have been inconsistent regarding the association between blood vitamin E levels and the risk of age-related cataract or glaucoma. Despite the encouraging effects of vitamin E from case series, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies in humans, the effects on cataract formation and/or progression have not been consistent among prospective and randomized control studies; few randomized control studies have tested the effects of supplemental vitamin E on glaucoma development or progression. Given the high prevalence of cataract and glaucoma in the elderly population, even a modest reduction in the risk for these eye diseases would potentially have a substantial public health impact; however, the potential benefits of vitamin E on cataract or glaucoma remain inconclusive and need to be carefully considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据