Systematic reviews do not (yet) represent the ‘gold standard’ of evidence: A position paper
出版年份 2022 全文链接
标题
Systematic reviews do not (yet) represent the ‘gold standard’ of evidence: A position paper
作者
关键词
-
出版物
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 557-566
出版商
Wiley
发表日期
2022-01-09
DOI
10.1002/ejp.1905
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Pharmacotherapy for the Prevention of Chronic Pain after Surgery in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- (2021) Meg E. Carley et al. ANESTHESIOLOGY
- Red for danger in systematic reviews?
- (2021) Andrew Moore European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy-Science and Practice
- Interpretation of chronic pain clinical trial outcomes
- (2020) Shannon M. Smith et al. PAIN
- Simple randomization did not protect against bias in smaller trials
- (2017) Tri-Long Nguyen et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Meta-assessment of bias in science
- (2017) Daniele Fanelli et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Practising evidence-based medicine in an era of high placebo response: Number needed to treat reconsidered
- (2016) Steven P. Roose et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
- (2016) JOHN P.A. IOANNIDIS MILBANK QUARTERLY
- Placebo Responses in Long-Standing Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2015) Gashirai K. Mbizvo et al. JOURNAL OF PAIN
- How systematic reviews cause research waste
- (2015) Ian Roberts et al. LANCET
- The knowledge system underpinning healthcare is not fit for purpose and must change
- (2015) I. Roberts et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The knowledge system underpinning healthcare is not fit for purpose and must change
- (2015) I. Roberts et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Pain measures and cut-offs - ‘no worse than mild pain’ as a simple, universal outcome
- (2013) R. A. Moore et al. ANAESTHESIA
- The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews
- (2013) Rebecca M. Turner et al. PLoS One
- Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
- (2013) A. Dechartres et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Expect analgesic failure; pursue analgesic success
- (2013) A. Moore et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Random error in cardiovascular meta-analyses: How common are false positive and false negative results?
- (2012) Zaina AlBalawi et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
- Improving the quality and reporting of systematic reviews⋆
- (2010) Christopher Eccleston et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
- “Evidence” in chronic pain – establishing best practice in the reporting of systematic reviews
- (2010) Andrew R. Moore et al. PAIN
- Impact of responder definition on the enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trial design for establishing proof of concept in neuropathic pain
- (2010) David J. Hewitt et al. PAIN
- Interpreting the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials: IMMPACT Recommendations
- (2007) Robert H. Dworkin et al. JOURNAL OF PAIN
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started