4.5 Article

Basal Insulin Degludec and Glycemic Control Compared to Aspart Via Insulin Pump in Type 1 Diabetes (BIGLEAP): A Single-Center, Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Trial

期刊

ENDOCRINE PRACTICE
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 165-172

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2021.11.001

关键词

type 1 diabetes; insulin degludec; glycemic control; hypoglycemia; insulin pump therapy; continuous glucose monitoring

资金

  1. Novo Nordisk, Baegsvard, Denmark

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared the efficacy of second-generation basal insulin degludec (IDeg) to insulin aspart via pump in patients with well-controlled type 1 diabetes, using continuous glucose monitoring. The results showed similar glycemic control, hypoglycemic rates, blood glucose stability, and hemoglobin A1C levels between IDeg and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).
Objective: We compared the efficacy of the second-generation basal insulin degludec (IDeg) to that of insulin aspart via pump using continuous glucose monitoring in patients with well-controlled type 1 diabetes. Methods: In this 40-week, single-center, randomized, crossover-controlled trial, adults with wellcontrolled type 1 diabetes (hemoglobin A1C of <7.5% [<58 mmol/mol]) (N = 52) who were using an insulin pump and continuous glucose monitoring were randomized to 1 of 2 treatments for a 20-week period: a single daily injection of IDeg with bolus aspart via pump or a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with aspart, followed by crossover to the other treatment. The primary endpoint was time in range (70-180 mg/dL) during the final 2 weeks of each treatment period. Results: Fifty-two patients were randomized and completed both treatment periods. The time in range for IDeg and CSII was 71.5% and 70.9%, respectively (P = .553). The time in level 1 hypoglycemia for the 24-hour period with IDeg and CSII was 2.19% and 1.75%, respectively (P = .065). The time in level 2 hypoglycemia for the 24-hour period with IDeg and CSII was 0.355% and 0.271%, respectively (P = .212), and the nocturnal period was 0.330% and 0.381%, respectively (P = .639). The mean standard deviation of blood glucose levels for the 24-hour period for IDeg and CSII was 52.4 mg/dL and 51.0 mg/dL, respectively (P = .294). The final hemoglobin A1C level for each treatment was 7.04% (53 mmol/mol) with IDeg, and 6.95% (52 mmol/mol) with CSII (P = .288). Adverse events were similar between treatments. Conclusion: We observed similar glycemic control between IDeg and insulin aspart via CSII for basal insulin coverage in patients with well-controlled type 1 diabetes. (c) 2021 AACE. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Endocrinology & Metabolism

A Randomized Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Compared With Insulin Aspart, Both in Combination With Insulin Degludec With or Without Metformin, in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (ONSET 9)

Wendy S. Lane, Elena Favaro, Naveen Rathor, Hak C. Jang, Maiken I. S. Kjaersgaard, Alejandra Oviedo, Ludger Rose, Peter Senior, Giorgio Sesti, Alfonso Soto Gonzalez, Edward Franek

DIABETES CARE (2020)

Article Endocrinology & Metabolism

Effective Overall Glycaemic Control with Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Across Patients with Different Baseline Characteristics: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Onset 9 Trial

Wendy Lane, Elena Favaro, Esteban Jodar, Pranav Kelkar, Alejandra Oviedo, Ramsathish Sivarathinasami, Peter A. Senior, Giorgio Sesti, Edward Franek

Summary: The study found that faster aspart provides effective glucose control and improved postprandial glucose control compared to IAsp in patients with type 2 diabetes. It also showed comparable or improved rates of hypoglycemia, especially in patients with good glucose control, the elderly, and those with insulin resistance.

DIABETES THERAPY (2022)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Switching to once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in individuals with basal-bolus insulin- treated type 2 diabetes (ONWARDS 4): a phase 3a, randomised, open-label, multicentre, treat-to-target, trial

Chantal Mathieu, Bjorg Asbjornsdottir, Harpreet S. Bajaj, Wendy Lane, Ana Laura S. A. Matos, Sreenivasa Murthy, Karolina Stachlewska, Julio Rosenstock

Summary: The ONWARDS 4 trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec with once-daily insulin glargine U100 in individuals with long-standing type 2 diabetes. The results showed that icodec demonstrated similar improvements in glycaemic control compared to glargine U100, with fewer basal insulin injections and no increase in hypoglycaemic rates. The trial had limitations including its relatively short duration and open-label design.

LANCET (2023)

暂无数据