4.7 Article

The Sustainable Development Goals as new business norms: A survey experiment on stakeholder preferences

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
卷 191, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107236

关键词

Sustainable development goals; Randomized controlled trial; Conjoint survey; Information treatment experiment; Sustainability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examines whether SDGs can function as business norms by investigating stakeholder support for sustainable practices. Results show that implementing SDGs increases stakeholders' preferences for companies, but a gap exists between stakeholders' preferred SDGs and companies' priorities. Increasing stakeholders' awareness is effective in closing this gap.
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were set by the United Nations General Assembly in 2015 to work towards a sustainable society in which economic prosperity is achieved and social and environmental concerns are met. Under the SDGs, businesses are expected to assume increasingly active roles. However, little is known about the relationship between the preferences of stakeholders and businesses' contributions to the SDGs. This study, therefore, investigates whether the SDGs can function as business norms by examining stakeholder support for sustainable practices. Specifically, the study examines preferences for companies that contribute to the SDGs and the effects of raising awareness regarding the inherent nature of the SDGs on stakeholders' preferences. To this end, we used a nationwide online survey dataset conducted in Japan (n = 6043) and employed a combination of conjoint analysis and an information treatment experiment. The results showed that implementing the SDGs increased stakeholders' preferences for companies. However, a gap existed between the stakeholders' preferred SDGs and the companies' priorities concerning the SDG implementation. The findings suggest that increasing stakeholders' awareness is effective in closing the gap.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据