4.4 Article

A federated learning method for network intrusion detection

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.6812

关键词

CICIDS2017; deep learning; federated learning; GRU; network intrusion detection

资金

  1. Contemporary Business and Trade Research Center of Zhejiang Gongshang University of China [2021SMYJ05LL]
  2. Center for Collaborative Innovation Studies of Modern Business of Zhejiang Gongshang University of China [2021SMYJ05LL]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61802095, 71702164]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY20G010001]
  5. Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [21NDJC083YB]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a network intrusion detection method based on federated learning, which has been proven to increase detection accuracy while protecting privacy.
Intrusion detection is a common network security defense technology. At present, there are many research using deep learning to realize network intrusion detection. This method has been proved to have high detection accuracy. However, deep learning requires large-scale data sets for training. The network intrusion detection data set of some institution is lacking. If the network traffic data set is uploaded for centralized deep learning training, it will face privacy problems. Combined with the characteristics of network traffic, this article proposes a network intrusion detection method based on federated learning. This method allows multiple ISPs or other institutions to conduct joint deep learning training on the premise of retaining local data. It not only improves the detection accuracy of the model but also protects privacy in network traffic. This article conducts experiments on the CICIDS2017 network intrusion detection data set. Experimental results show that worker participating in federated learning have higher detection accuracy. The accuracy and other performance of federated learning are almost equal to those of centralized deep learning models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据