4.5 Article

Discrete element method simulation of energy dissipation mechanisms of HMX explosive particles under drop-weight impact

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.111129

关键词

HMX explosive particles; Discrete element method; Plastic dissipation; Friction dissipation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11872345]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The developed thermal-mechanical coupling model based on the discrete element method (DEM) effectively captures the energy dissipation of HMX explosive particles during drop-weight impact. Simulation results show that energy dissipation increases with drop-weight height, particle size, and moment of inertia of particle, but decreases when sample mass increases under the same impact conditions. The dominant contribution to energy dissipation is found to be rolling friction dissipation in the absence of internal defects.
A thermal-mechanical coupling model describing energy dissipation of cyclotetramethylene-tetranitramine (HMX) explosive particles subjected to drop-weight impact is developed based on the discrete element method (DEM). The energy dissipation resulting from plastic deformation, sliding friction and rolling friction due to the interaction of HMX explosive particles can be effectively captured during the impact loading process by DEM. The simulation results illustrate that the energy dissipation increases with the increase of drop-weight height, particle size, and moment of inertia of particle, but the energy dissipation decreases when the sample mass increases from 40 mg to 55 mg at the same impact loading condition. Moreover, it is found that the energy dissipation is dominated by interparticle friction dissipation in the absence of internal defects such as cracks or pores, which is in agreement with previously published results. Furthermore, this work reveals that the main contribution of friction dissipation is derived from rolling friction dissipation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据