4.7 Review

Simulation-based optimisation for injection configuration design of liquid composite moulding processes: A review

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106540

关键词

C; Numerical analysis; C; Process modelling; E; Liquid composite moulding; E; Resin flow

资金

  1. Ford Motor Company [URP2016-4010R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The advancements in process modelling and simulation for composites manufacturing have led to the importance of mould design optimization for improving manufacturing efficiency and product quality, particularly through the introduction of optimization algorithms in predictive numerical simulations. As simulation-based optimization becomes more prevalent, the discussion on search performance, solution optimality, and application suitability of different algorithms in various moulding scenarios is crucial for providing guidelines for future optimization studies.
Process modelling and simulation for composites manufacturing have advanced remarkably lately, evolving from just an assistive design tool to playing a pivotal role in the optimisation of Liquid Composite Moulding (LCM) processes. In particular, to improve the mould filling stage, the placement optimisation of resin injection gates and air vents on the mould design has received great research attention due to their substantial influence on the manufacturing efficiency and product quality. When optimisation algorithms are introduced into predictive numerical simulations to assist mould design, the notion of simulation-based optimisation is formed. This review provides a comprehensive literature compilation on the state-of-the-art of simulation-based optimisation of gates and vents configuration for LCM processes, focusing on the optimisation algorithms adopted and their respective search strategies. The search performance, solution optimality and application suitability of each algorithm with respect to different moulding scenarios are discussed to provide helpful guidelines for future optimisation studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据