4.6 Article

MAPS: A Quantitative Radiomics Approach for Prostate Cancer Detection

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 63, 期 6, 页码 1145-1156

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2485779

关键词

Computer-aided detection; feature models; multiparametric MRI (mpMRI); prostate cancer detection; prostate MRI; radiomics

资金

  1. Ontario Institute of Cancer Research
  2. Canada Research Chairs programs
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Ministry of Research and Innovation of Ontario

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a quantitative radiomics feature model for performing prostate cancer detection using multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). It incorporates a novel tumor candidate identification algorithm to efficiently and thoroughly identify the regions of concern and constructs a comprehensive radiomics feature model to detect tumorous regions. In contrast to conventional automated classification schemes, this radiomics-based feature model aims to ground its decisions in a way that can be interpreted and understood by the diagnostician. This is done by grouping features into high-level feature categories which are already used by radiologists to diagnose prostate cancer: Morphology, Asymmetry, Physiology, and Size (MAPS), using biomarkers inspired by the PI-RADS guidelines for performing structured reporting on prostate MRI. Clinical mpMRI data were collected from 13 men with histology-confirmed prostate cancer and labeled by an experienced radiologist. These annotated data were used to train classifiers using the proposed radiomics-driven feature model in order to evaluate the classification performance. The preliminary experimental results indicated that the proposed model outperformed each of its constituent feature groups as well as a comparable conventional mpMRI feature model. A further validation of the proposed algorithm will be conducted using a larger dataset as future work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据