4.5 Article

Lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using an equine-derived collagen-containing bone block: A prospective case series

期刊

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 142-149

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/clr.13873

关键词

bone regeneration; bone substitutes; clinical research; wound healing

资金

  1. Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that using CXBB for lateral alveolar ridge augmentation and staged implant placement is an effective method, allowing for successful placement of adequately dimensioned titanium implants and showing favorable clinical outcomes.
Objectives To assess the clinical performance of an equine-derived collagen-containing bone block (CXBB) for lateral alveolar ridge augmentation and staged implant placement. Material and Methods A total of n = 16 patients (16 implants) had received a modified surgical protocol for lateral ridge augmentation using a size-adapted rigidly fixed CXBB and contour augmentation. After 26 weeks of submerged healing, the primary endpoint was defined as the final ridge width (RW26) sufficient to place an adequately dimensioned titanium implant at the respective sites. Secondary outcomes included the gain in ridge width (RWg) and the need for secondary grafting. Clinical outcomes (bleeding on probing-BOP, probing depth-PD, and mucosal recession-MR) were assessed at implant loading and after a median observation period of 12.3 months. Results In all patients (n = 16) investigated, RW26 allowed for a successful placement of an adequately dimensioned titanium implant at respective sites exhibiting mean RWg values of 5.09 +/- 1.07 mm. A soft tissue dehiscence was noted in one patient (6.3%), and a secondary grafting was needed in two patients (12.5%) The changes in mean BOP, PD, and MR values at V9 amounted to 10.23 +/- 30.11%, 0.14 +/- 0.80 mm, and -0.01 +/- 0.04 mm, respectively. Conclusions CXBB may represent a feasible approach for lateral alveolar ridge augmentation and two-stage implant placement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据