4.7 Article

Nanocomposites of zero-valent iron@biochar derived from agricultural wastes for adsorptive removal of tetracyclines

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 284, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131342

关键词

Antibiotics; Hybrid; Low-cost carbon; Adsorption

资金

  1. Key Lab of Eco-restoration of Regional Contaminated Environment (Shenyang University), Ministry of Education [2019_ERRCE_G5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the adsorptive removal mechanism of three tetracycline antibiotics from aqueous solutions by zero-valent iron@biochar nanocomposites prepared using hazelnut shell as the carbon source. The experimental results showed that under optimized conditions, the nanocomposite exhibited high removal efficiencies of up to 95% for oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline, indicating potential applications in antibiotic removal.
Tetracycline antibiotics as the emerging pollutants had been drawn abroad increasing concerns. An agricultural waste, the lignocellulosic hazelnut shell, was used as the carbon source to prepare the nanocomposites of zerovalent iron@biochar by pyrolytic reduction method at 1123 K for 2 h in N-2 atmosphere. The adsorptive removal of tetracycline, oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline by the zero-valent iron@biochar from aqueous solution was investigated by batch method. The optimal experimental conditions were found to be at pH 6-7 with a contact time of 40 min. The adsorbed amounts of oxytetracycline, chlortetracycline and tetracycline at 298 K were 52.7, 42.5 and 39.1 mg g(-1), respectively. Adsorption process of three antibiotics by the nanocomposite pursued Langmuir and pseudo-second-order equations. Thermodynamic parameters illustrated that the adsorption was spontaneous and endothermic intrinsically. The high removal efficiencies up to 95% of the zero-valent iron@biochar for oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline from the culture wastewaters had opened the potential applications for the removal of the antibiotics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据