4.7 Article

Wastewater treatment and emerging contaminants: Bibliometric analysis

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 297, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133932

关键词

Bibliometric analysis; Wastewater treatment; Emerging contaminants

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1805263]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides a comprehensive summary of wastewater treatment and emerging contaminants research from 1998 to 2021 using bibliometric analysis. The analysis reveals that China has the highest number of publications and the closest cooperation with the United States. The most cited papers indicate that purification or removal techniques such as ozonation or membrane filtration can effectively remove pharmaceutical compounds from the water environment. Efficient detection of emerging contaminants and optimization of removal methods are identified as current challenges.
In recent years, emerging contaminants have been found in the wastewater, surface water, and even drinking water, which should be treated to ensure the safety of our living environment. In this study, we provide a comprehensive summary of wastewater treatment and emerging contaminants research from 1998 to 2021 by using the bibliometric analysis. This study is conducted based on the Web of Science Core Collection Database. The bibliometix R-package, VOSviewer and CiteSpace software are used for bibliometric analysis and science mapping. A dataset of 10, 605 publications has been retrieved. The analysis results show that China has produced the most publications. China and the United States have the closest cooperation. Analysis of the most cited papers reveals that the purification or removal techniques such as ozonation or membrane filtration can effectively remove pharmaceutical compounds from the water environment. We also found that the efficient detection of emerging contaminants and the optimization of removal methods are current challenges. Finally, future research directions are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据