4.6 Article

Precise and fast microdroplet size distribution measurement using deep learning

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 247, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.116926

关键词

Microfluidics; Droplet size measurement; Deep learning; Convolutional neural network; Instance segmentation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21991100, 21991104, 92034303]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A state-of-the-art deep learning-based method is proposed in this study to measure the size of microdroplets, significantly reducing manual workload and increasing measurement efficiency. By intelligently segmenting microdroplets and fitting their boundaries, precise size distribution curves are obtained. This new method can detect and measure overlapped droplets and small-sized satellite droplets that were previously unachievable.
Microfluidic technology is a versatile approach to improve the production of various fine chemicals and materials, where precise and fast size measurement of microdroplets in microscopic images is of pivotal significance for microfluidic device design. With recent developments in convolutional neural networks, we herein proposed a state-of-the-art deep learning-based method to cope with microdroplet size measurement and largely ease manual workload. The proposed method instance-wisely segments microdroplets with deep learning, and then fits their boundaries to obtain precise size distribution curves. Even overlapped droplets and small-sized satellite droplets can be detected and measured, which is not achievable in previous computer methods. Incredibly, diameter measurement error is as small as 0.75 mu m, and the measurement efficiency is increased similar to 1000 times compared to manual measuring. This work not only sheds light on intellectual size measurement of microdroplets, but also points out a new way to promote microfluidic technology through deep learning methods. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据