4.7 Article

Co-doped NixPy loading on Co3O4 embedded in Ni foam as a hierarchically porous self-supported electrode for overall water splitting

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 422, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130062

关键词

Co-doped transition metal phosphide; Overall water splitting; Bifunctional electrocatalyst; Self-supported electrode

资金

  1. Key Basic Research Program of Hebei Province of China [18964408D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A self-supported catalyst Co-NixPy@Co3O4/NF with high performance in overall water splitting was successfully synthesized through a simple method and electroless plating process, showing low overpotentials for hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions and long-term stability.
It had remained a challenge to rationally design a highly efficient bifunctional catalyst for overall water splitting using non-precious metals. Herein, a simple method was presented to synthesize a self-supported catalyst using nickel foam (NF) filled with nanoscale Co3O4 (Co3O4/NF) as a hierarchical porous support. A NiCoP alloy was deposited on the Co3O4/NF in the form of profiling growth by electroless plating (NiCoP@Co3O4/NF). And then, the NiCoP@Co3O4/NF electrodes were phosphorylated. The profile-grown NiCoP alloy transformed into a twodimensional (2D) flake-like Co-doped NixPy, forming a self-supported electrocatalyst (Co-NixPy@Co3O4/NF). The Co-NixPy@Co3O4/NF electrode exhibited a large surface area, excellent conductivity, and synergy between metal atoms. This electrode also possessed low overpotentials of 72 and 120 mV to drive the hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions at 10 mA cm-2. For overall water splitting, the self-supported Co-NixPy@Co3O4/NF electrode only required a low voltage of 1.47 V to reach the current densities of 20 mA cm-2 in 1 M KOH with long-term stability for 36 h. This work represented an achievement the exploration of a new bifunctional of transition metal phosphides with high performances in water splitting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据