4.7 Article

CeO2-modified MIL-101(Fe) for photocatalysis extraction oxidation desulfurization of model oil under visible light irradiation

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 422, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130036

关键词

CeO2; MIL-101(Fe); Oxidation desulfurization; Photocatalysis; Extraction

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province, China [B2020203025, B2019203384]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21606193]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CeO2/MIL-101(Fe) catalysts were designed by introducing different amounts of CeO2 into MIL-101(Fe), and the photocatalytic activity for removing DBT was found to be high under visible-light irradiation. Radical scavenger experiments confirmed that -OH and -O2- were main reactive species in the process, forming a synergistic effect.
CeO2/MIL-101(Fe) catalysts for a photocatalysis-extraction oxidation desulfurization (PEODS) system were designed by introducing different amounts of CeO2 into MIL-101(Fe). And, the materials were further analyzed via some characterization technologies. Moreover, an optimization system, composed of CeO2/MIL-101(Fe), extractant acetonitrile and oxidant H2O2, was selected to remove dibenzothiophene (DBT) from model oil under visible-light irradiation. Evaluation results illustrated that 90% of DBT in oil phase was able to be transformed within 2 h as the adding amount of CeO2, the volume ratio of model oil to acetonitrile and the molar ratio of H2O2 to DBT was 60 mg, 2:1 and 3:1, respectively. Radical scavenger experiments verified that -OH and -O2- were main reactive species in the process. The high photocatalytic activity was originated from a synergic effect produced between active sites of CeO2 and active surface of MIL-101(Fe) and formed heterostructure in the catalyst, which broadened optical response ranges and facilitated photoinduced charge separations and transfers. Additionally, a convinced PEODS mechanism was proposed and rationalized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据