4.7 Article

Efficient luminescence lifetime thermometry with enhanced Mn4+-activated BaLaCa1-xMgxSbO6 red phosphors

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 430, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132923

关键词

Luminescence thermometry; Crystal field; Transition metal luminescence; Lifetime

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52072101, 51972088, 52172205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introducing smaller Mg2+ ions to replace Ca2+ site in the BaLaCaSbO6 matrix leads to a significant enhancement in luminescence intensity, red-shift, and luminescence lifetime. These modulations are mainly attributed to the strengthen pressure on the local structure, superior lattice rigidity, and suppression of non-radiative transition after the substitution of smaller Mg2+. The effective lifetime-based luminescence thermometry is achieved due to thermal quenching behavior of Mn4+ ions in the matrix.
Mn4+-activated phosphors are of great interest in luminescence lifetime thermometry due to the luxuriant luminescence properties influenced by the locally surrounding crystal field. It is highly desirable to develop effective Mn4+-based luminescence lifetime thermometry through modulating the structural parameters. In this work, by introducing the smaller Mg2+ ions to replace Ca2+ site in the BaLaCaSbO6 matrix, a 4.2-fold enhance in the luminescence intensity, red-shifted from 690 nm to 698 nm, as well as luminescence lifetime increase from 0.212 to 0.951 ms is achieved. These modulations are mainly attributed to the strengthen pressure on the local structure, superior lattice rigidity and suppresses non-radiative transition after the substitution of smaller Mg2+. Interestingly, owing to the obvious thermal quenching behavior of Mn4+ ions in the matrix, effective lifetime-based luminescence thermometry can be realized. Mg2+ dopant results in the improvement of the absolute sensitivity from 1.22 mu sK(-1) (BaLaCaSbO6:Mn4+@408 K) to 4.88 mu sK(-1) (BaLaCa0.1Mg0.9SbO6:Mn4+@401 K).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据