4.4 Article

Effect of antibody switch in non-responders to a CGRP receptor antibody treatment in migraine: A multi-center retrospective cohort study

期刊

CEPHALALGIA
卷 42, 期 4-5, 页码 291-301

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/03331024211048765

关键词

Migraine; switch; responder rate; erenumab; galcanezumab; fremanezumab

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that switching to a different class of CGRP-mAb resulted in positive treatment response in nearly one-third of migraine patients, with 12% achieving over 50% response rate. There was a reduction in monthly headache days after the switch. Patients with daily headaches did not respond to the treatment change, while half of the non-daily headache patients achieved a 30% response.
Background Switching between antibody classes might be a treatment option in migraine patients who have not responded to one class of a CGRP-(receptor) monoclonal antibody (mAb), but there are no efficacy data so far. In this real-world analysis, we assessed the treatment response to a CGRP-mAb in patients that have previously failed the CGRP-receptor-mAb erenumab. Methods We analyzed retrospective headache diary data of 78 patients with migraine who switched between CGRP-mAbs classes at four German headache centers either due to lack of efficacy or intolerable side effects. Among these, we identified 25 patients who did not respond to erenumab after three treatment cycles (defined as <30% reduction of monthly headache days) and had complete headache documentation at least one month before and during both treatments. We assessed the >= 30% responder rate at month three after switching from erenumab to a CGRP-mAb (galcanezumab or fremanezumab) (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints included >= 50% responder rate, monthly headache days, and monthly days with acute medication use. In an exploratory subgroup analysis patients were stratified for daily and non-daily headache. Results The switch from erenumab to a CGRP-mAb led to a >= 30% response in one-third (32%) of the patients after three treatment cycles. A >= 50% response was achieved in 12% of the patients. Monthly headache days were reduced in month three compared to baseline (20.8 +/- 7.1 to 17.8 +/- 9.1; p = 0.009). Stratified analysis revealed that no patient with daily headache (n = 9) responded to the treatment switch, while a 30% response was achieved by 50% of patients with non-daily headache (n = 16). Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that a relevant proportion of erenumab non-responders might benefit from a treatment switch to a CGRP-mAb. Switching seems to be a promising treatment option especially in migraine patients with non-daily headache.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据