4.8 Article

In vivo CRISPR screens identify the E3 ligase Cop1 as a modulator of macrophage infiltration and cancer immunotherapy target

期刊

CELL
卷 184, 期 21, 页码 5357-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Breast Cancer Research Foundation [BCRF-20-100, BCRF-20-019]
  2. NIH [R01CA234018]
  3. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation [DRQ-04-20]
  4. Sara Elizabeth O'Brien Trust
  5. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study suggests that Cop1 may be a potential target for improving cancer immunotherapy efficacy in TNBC by regulating chemokine secretion and macrophage infiltration in the tumor microenvironment, as demonstrated through experiments in mouse models. This finding highlights the importance of understanding the role of Cop1 in TNBC treatment and its potential implications for enhancing anti-tumor immunity.
Despite remarkable clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in cancer treatment, ICB benefits for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remain limited. Through pooled in vivo CRISPR knockout (KO) screens in syngeneic TNBC mouse models, we found that deletion of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Cop1 in cancer cells decreases secretion of macrophage-associated chemokines, reduces tumor macrophage infiltration, enhances anti-tumor immunity, and strengthens ICB response, Transcriptomics, epigenomics, and proteomics analyses revealed that Cop1 functions through proteasomal degradation of the C/ebp delta protein. The Cop1 substrate Trib2 functions as a scaffold linking Cop1 and C/ebp delta, which leads to polyubiquitination of C/ebp delta. In addition, deletion of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Cop1 in cancer cells stabilizes C/ebp delta to suppress expression of macrophage chemoattractant genes. Our integrated approach implicates Cop1 as a target for improving cancer immunotherapy efficacy in TNBC by regulating chemokine secretion and macrophage infiltration in the tumor microenvironment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据