4.7 Article

Transparent cellulose/aramid nanofibers films with improved mechanical and ultraviolet shielding performance from waste cotton textiles by in-situ fabrication

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 273, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118569

关键词

Cellulose; aramid nanofibers films; Ultraviolet shielding performances; In-situ fabrication; Waste cotton; Valorization

资金

  1. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Biobased Material and Green Papermaking, Qilu University of Technology, Shandong Academy of Sciences [ZZ20200127]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using waste cotton textiles as raw materials, transparent cellulose/aramid nanofibers films were successfully fabricated with improved mechanical properties and UV-shielding performance. Strong hydrogen bonding interactions between ANFs and cellulose chains enhanced the tensile strength and elongation of the films, leading to their superior mechanical properties.
Cellulose films with biodegradability and intrinsically antistatic property have many applications. However, conventional cellulose films show poor toughness and UV-shielding property, and the major sources are highgrade cotton linter or wood pulp. Herein, by using low-cost waste cotton textiles as the raw materials, we successfully fabricated transparent cellulose/aramid nanofibers (ANFs) films, in which in-situ retained ANFs had a diameter of 20-30 nm and a length of several micrometers. Because ANFs and cellulose chains formed strong hydrogen bonding interactions, the tensile strength and elongation of the resultant cellulose/ANFs film with 1.0 wt% ANFs could reach 54.4 MPa and 15.8%, respectively, increased by 63.4% and 154% compared to those of pure cellulose film (33.3 MPa and 6.2%). Meanwhile, the cellulose/ANFs films show excellent UV-shielding properties and irradiation stability. Hence, the novel cellulose/ANFs films with improved mechanical and UVshielding performance were in-situ prepared leading to enhance the valorization of waste cotton textiles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据