4.7 Article

In vitro/vivo antitumor study of modified-chitosan/carboxymethyl chitosan boosted charge-reversal nanoformulation

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 269, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118268

关键词

Self-assembly; Charge reversal; Polysaccharide-based nanoformulation; Chitosan derivatives; Antitumor nanosystem

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82001961]
  2. Youth Start-up Fund Project of Yantai University [YX19B04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a polysaccharide-based charge-switchable nanoformulation to enhance the efficacy of the anticancer drug DOX, showing promising stability and pH-sensitivity. The nanoformulation significantly improved cellular uptake, apoptosis/necrosis rates, and tumor inhibition in vivo, with a 226% enhancement compared to free DOX.
Major obstacles in the development of nanoformulations as efficient drug delivery systems are the rapid clearance from blood circulation and lysosomal entrapment. To overcome these problems, a polysaccharide-based core-shell type charge-switchable nanoformulation (CS-LA-DMMA/CMCS/PAMAM@DOX) is constructed to improve antitumor efficacy of DOX. By applying carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCS) as bridge polymer and negatively charged chitosan-derivative as outer shell, the stability and pH-sensitivity of this nanoformulation is promisingly enhanced. Furthermore, the positively charged PAMAM@DOX could escape from lysosomes via proton sponge effect and cationic-anionic interaction with lysosome membranes. Admirable cellular uptake and high apoptosis/necrosis rate were detected in this study. In vitro assays demonstrate that the CS-LA-DMMA/ CMCS/PAMAM@DOX was internalized into HepG2 cells predominantly via the clathrin-mediated endocytosis pathway. Excitingly, in vivo studies showed that high accumulation of CS-LA-DMMA/CMCS/PAMAM@DOX in tumor tissue led to enhanced tumor inhibition. Compared with free DOX, the tumor inhibition rate of nanoformulation was improved up to 226%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据