4.7 Article

Metabolism and function of polyamines in cancer progression

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 519, 期 -, 页码 91-104

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.06.020

关键词

Polyamine; Metabolism; Cancer; Therapy

类别

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [NRF-2020R1A2C1003791, NRF-2016K1A4A3914725]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyamines, essential for the proliferation and development of eukaryotes, are low-molecular-weight organic polycations with strict intracellular regulation. In cancer, dysregulation of polyamine metabolism leads to elevated levels and interactions with oncogenic pathways like mTOR and RAS, making them potential therapeutic targets. Unraveling the molecular mechanisms linking polyamine metabolism to carcinogenesis is crucial for developing novel inhibitors and understanding the findings of clinical trials.
Polyamines are essential for the proliferation, differentiation, and development of eukaryotes. They include spermine, spermidine, and the diamine precursor putrescine, and are low-molecular-weight, organic polycations with more than two amino groups. Their intracellular concentrations are strictly maintained within a specific physiological range through several regulatory mechanisms in normal cells. In contrast, polyamine metabolism is dysregulated in many neoplastic states, including cancer. In various types of cancer, polyamine levels are elevated, and crosstalk occurs between polyamine metabolism and oncogenic pathways, such as mTOR and RAS pathways. Thus, polyamines might have potential as therapeutic targets in the prevention and treatment of cancer. The molecular mechanisms linking polyamine metabolism to carcinogenesis must be unraveled to develop novel inhibitors of polyamine metabolism. This overview describes the nature of polyamines, their association with carcinogenesis, the development of polyamine inhibitors and their potential, and the findings of clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据