4.8 Article

Application of machine learning in anaerobic digestion: Perspectives and challenges

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 345, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126433

关键词

Anaerobic digestion; Process instability; Process optimization; Machine learning; Modeling

资金

  1. Multi-State Research through the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawai'i at Manoa
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) [001]
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [315018/2018-6, 315405/2018-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review critically examines the application of machine learning in the anaerobic digestion process, focusing on evaluating important algorithms and their applications in AD modeling, and outlining the challenges faced by ML in this context.
Anaerobic digestion (AD) is widely adopted for remediating diverse organic wastes with simultaneous production of renewable energy and nutrient-rich digestate. AD process, however, suffers from instability, thereby adversely affecting biogas production. There have been significant efforts in developing strategies to control the AD process to maintain process stability and predict AD performance. Among these strategies, machine learning (ML) has gained significant interest in recent years in AD process optimization, prediction of uncertain parameters, detection of perturbations, and real-time monitoring. ML uses inductive inference to generalize correlations between input and output data, subsequently used to make informed decisions in new circumstances. This review aims to critically examine ML as applied to the AD process and provides an in-depth assessment of important algorithms (ANN, ANFIS, SVM, RF, GA, and PSO) and their applications in AD modeling. The review also outlines some challenges and perspectives of ML, and highlights future research directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据