4.8 Review

A review of biochar in anaerobic digestion to improve biogas production: Performances, mechanisms and economic assessments

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 341, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125797

关键词

Biochar; Anaerobic digestion; Biogas production; Methane; Economic and environmental analysis

资金

  1. Heilongjiang Nature Science Foundation [YQ2020E022]
  2. National Nature ScienceFoundation of China [51878213]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment [2020TS01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review comprehensively summarizes the applications, performances, and economies of biochar strategies in anaerobic digestion systems, elucidating the improvement effects of biochar application on biogas production and purification, and evaluating the mechanisms for enhancing digestion efficiency through biochar addition.
Anaerobic digestion (AD) technology still faces some challenges including low methane productivity, instable operation efficiency and undesired refractory substances degradation. Biochar has recently been recognized as a promising alternative addition in AD process to enhance methane production. Based on VOSviewer analysis, this review presents a comprehensive summarizing of the applications, performances, and economies of biochar strategies in AD system. Firstly, typical production processes of biochar and its main characteristics including adsorption and immobilization ability, buffering ability and electron transfer ability were evaluated. Then, the applications of biochar in AD and its improving effects on biogas production/purification were summarized. Accordingly, the corresponding mechanisms of biochar addition in AD for digestion efficiency improvement were elucidated. Finally, the economic and environmental feasibilities of application biochar in AD, as well as prospective future studies were summarized. Through an overview of biochar in AD system, this paper aims to promote its widely practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据