4.5 Article

Variation in filtration and ingestion rates among different microalgae species by hard clam, Mercenaria mercenaria, larvae and post-set juveniles

期刊

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 684-688

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/are.15585

关键词

filtration; ingestion; larvae; Mercenaria mercenaria; microalgae; post-set

资金

  1. Seaventure Clam Co. [19-284]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the filtration and ingestion rates of different microalgae species by hard clam larvae and post-set. The results showed that flagellates were filtered and ingested at higher rates than diatoms, and Tisochrysis lutea had the highest filtration and ingestion rates among all evaluated species. The differences in rates were primarily attributed to the size, shape, and dry weight of the microalgae species.
This study investigated filtration and ingestion rates of various microalgae species by hard clam, Mercenaria mercenaria, larvae (veliger, pediveliger) and post-set. Four microalgae species, Tisochrysis lutea, Pavlova lutheri, Chaetoceros gracilis and C. muelleri were evaluated for larvae, and an additional species Cyclotella nana, were evaluated for post-set. Flagellates (T. lutea and P. lutheri) were filtered and ingested at higher rates than diatoms (C. gracilis, C. muelleri and C. nana) by both larvae and post-set. T. lutea was filtered and ingested at a higher rate than all other microalgae species evaluated. The filtration rate of T. lutea was 11.2 mu l/ hr, 26.6 mu l/ hr and 342.2 mu l/ hr by veliger larvae, pediveliger larvae and post-set respectively. Ingestion rate of T. lutea was 369 cells/hr, 1441 cells/hr and 10,357 cells/hr by veliger larvae, pediveliger larvae and post-set respectively. In contrast, C. muelleri was filtered and ingested at lower rates by larvae, and C. nana was filtered and ingested at lower rates by post-set compared with other microalgae species. The differences in filtration and ingestion rates among microalgae species were primarily attributed to the size, shape and dry weight of microalgae species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据