4.7 Article

Liquid cooling vs hybrid cooling for fast charging lithium-ion batteries: A comparative numerical study

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 208, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118226

关键词

Lithium-ion; PCM; Hybrid; Batteries; Fast charging; Cooling

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) , Human Resource Develop-ment Group (HRDG) (Extramural research division) , India [08/542 (0015) /2021-EMR-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-ion batteries require efficient thermal management systems for safe operation. Cooling methods such as liquid cooling and hybrid cooling have been proposed, but their suitability for fast charging lithium-ion batteries has not been explored. This study investigates the performance of liquid cooling and hybrid cooling methods and concludes that liquid cooling is more effective for cooling fast charging lithium-ion batteries.
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) rely on efficient thermal management systems for their safe and reliable operation. Issues like overheating of LIBs due to excessive heat generation, thermal runaway and thermal propagation are still a challenge for engineers. To address the challenge, numerous cooling methods viz. liquid cooling, air cooling, cooling using phase change materials (PCMs), hybrid cooling (i.e., combining liquid and PCM cooling), etc., have been proposed by different authors in the past. Though all the above methods are best suited for LIBs under normal charging/discharging operations, their suitability for cooling fast charging LIBs remains unexplored. In general, the heat generation and risks due to thermal runaway in LIBs are relatively more during fast charging than normal charging. As regards hybrid cooling employing PCMs, the method is yet to be bench marked, as PCMs themselves suffer from low thermal conductivity issues that may affect their overall thermal performance. The present work is an attempt to address the above-stated aspects. Detailed 3D numerical simulations on three different design configurations (D1-D3) of a prismatic LIB module consisting of four 10 Ah batteries fast charged at 8C rate are reported herein. Two different cooling methods viz. (i) liquid cooling employing a dielectric liquid coolant (STO-50) and (ii) hybrid cooling combining liquid dielectric and a PCM (RT35) are investigated, and their performances compared. The results reveal interesting facts on the ability of liquid cooling (D2) over hybrid cooling (D3) for fast charging LIBs. Parametric studies show that the coolant flow direction (horizontal/vertical) and thermal conductivity of the PCM (k(pcm)) have a profound influence on the cooling obtained compared to PCM's melting temperature (T-m) and latent heat (lambda). It is concluded that PCM based hybrid cooling is not suitable for cooling LIBs under fast charging unless k(pcm) is enhanced to 1 W/mK or above. A minimum coolant flow rate of 2 lpm is needed to limit the battery temperatures to 40 degrees C or below for the module under fast charging conditions. An increase in PCMs latent heat from 160 to 200 kJ/kg has no significant influence on the cooling achieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据