4.6 Article

Proximity-induced magnetism and the enhancement of damping in ferromagnetic/heavy metal systems

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 119, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0064336

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [1771248, EP/P510476/1]
  2. Royal Society [IF170030]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, and Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. UK EPSRC XMaS facility
  5. National Science Centre Poland through the OPUS funding [2019/33/B/ST5/02013]
  6. [CS 1771248]
  7. EPSRC [EP/S020802/1, EP/S020845/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationship between proximity-induced magnetism at the heavy metal/ferromagnet interface and spin-transport has been investigated through element specific x-ray magnetic circular dichroism and ferromagnetic resonance measurements on CoFe/Au/Pt and NiFe/Au/Pt thin film samples. The results show a linear relationship between the magnitude of Pt PIM and damping enhancement in both systems, indicating that electronic hybridization of the heavy metal and ferromagnet is essential for understanding damping enhancement and interfacial spin-transport for spintronic devices.
The relationship between proximity-induced magnetism (PIM) at the heavy metal/ferromagnet interface and spin-transport across such interfaces has generated significant debate. To investigate the link between the two, element specific x-ray magnetic circular dichroism and ferromagnetic resonance measurements were made on the same CoFe/Au/Pt and NiFe/Au/Pt thin film samples with varying Au thickness, with complementary SIMS analysis, which shows evidence of Ni diffusion from NiFe into the Pt. An approximately linear relationship is observed between the magnitude of Pt PIM and magnitude of damping enhancement in both systems. The results demonstrate that electronic hybridization of the heavy metal and ferromagnet is required for a full understanding of damping enhancement and interfacial spin-transport for spintronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据