4.5 Article

Enhancing firefly algorithm with adaptive multi-group mechanism

期刊

APPLIED INTELLIGENCE
卷 52, 期 9, 页码 9795-9815

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-021-02766-9

关键词

Optimization; Firefly algorithm; Multi-group; Efficiency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61763019]
  2. Science and Technology Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20202BABL202019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The modified firefly algorithm, called the visual firefly algorithm (VFA), is proposed in this paper to improve the efficiency of solving continuous optimal problems. By combining the assumption of fireflies' visual field with designed strategies to balance exploration and exploitation, VFA provides suitable solutions for most CEC2013 problems with different dimensions and maintains robust performance as the problems become more complex.
Firefly algorithm (FA) is efficient in solving continuous optimal problems, because of its ability to a global search. However, the redundant attractions and incorrect directions may reduce the efficiency of FA. To improve the performance of FA, a novel multi-group mechanism is proposed based on an assumption that firefly has a visual field. The modified firefly algorithm is called the visual firefly algorithm(VFA). The framework of VFA combines the assumption with the designed strategies to balance the exploration and exploitation. Where the proposed observer strategy works for the exploration, the suggested selective random strategy plays the role of the exploiter. To verify the performance of the presented algorithm, extensive experiments are executed on CEC2013 benchmark functions. Additionally, the efficiency of the proposed multi-group mechanism is analyzed in-depth. The experimental results reveal that the proposed multi-group mechanism improves FA and provides a suitable solution for most CEC2013 problems with different dimensions. Especially, its performance remains robust, where the problems become more complex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据