4.8 Article

A green and high-yield route to recycle waste masks into CNTs/Ni hybrids via catalytic carbonization and their application for superior microwave absorption

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 298, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120544

关键词

Catalytic carbonization; Polymer wastes; Recycle; Microwave absorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51991353, 51773202]
  2. National Science Centre Poland [OPUS UMO-2018/29/B/ST8/01265]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A green and high-yield route has been developed to recycle waste masks into CNTs/Ni hybrids with superior microwave absorption capabilities. The mechanism of the as-fabricated hybrids was mainly attributed to the synergistic effects of CNTs and Ni on conduction and magnetic losses, polarization, and impedance matching, providing a scalable and cost-effective strategy for recycling waste masks into valuable carbon nanomaterials.
With the worldwide pandemic of COVID-19, a tremendous amount of face masks have been consumed and discarded, resulting in serious environment pollution and infectious hazards. Herein a green and high-yield route has been developed to recycle waste masks (WMs) into CNTs/Ni hybrids via catalytic carbonization. Our results exhibited that the yield of carbon was as high as 64.4 g/100 g WMs. Furthermore, the as-fabricated CNTs/Ni hybrids were applied for microwave absorption, which displayed superior performances, including a strong reflection loss of -56.3 dB and an absorption bandwidth of 4.3 GHz with absorber thickness of only 2.0 mm. The mechanism was mainly ascribed to the favorable synergistic effects of CNTs and Ni on conduction and magnetic losses, dipolar polarization, interfacial polarization and impedance matching. Thus, this work provides an environmentally friendly, scalable and cost-effective strategy for recycling waste masks into high-valuable carbon nanomaterials, and exploits their potential application for microwave absorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据