4.3 Article

Efficacy of a Novel Oral Chemotherapeutic Agent, TAS-102, Against Human Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells

期刊

ANTICANCER RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 12, 页码 6039-6049

出版社

INT INST ANTICANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15423

关键词

TAS-102; oral squamous cell carcinoma; phosphorylated AKT; p-AKT; anti-angiogenesis; NF-kappa B

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [18K09814]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K09814] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that TAS-102 significantly inhibits the growth and migration of oral squamous cell carcinoma, suggesting a potential role in inhibiting angiogenesis and proliferation of OSCC cells.
Background: TAS-102 is effective against unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal and gastric cancer. However, its effect on oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is still unknown. Here, we tried to clarify the possible effect of TAS-102 against angiogenesis and proliferation of human OSCC cells. Materials and Methods: 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay, migration assay and mice xenograft models were used to determine the effect of TAS-102 on growth and migration of OSCC. The activity of phosphorylated nuclear factor kappa light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cells (NF-kappa B) (p-p65) in cells was detected by immunocytochemistry. The expression of p-AKT serine/threonine kinase 1 (p-AKT), p-p65, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF2) and CD31 in mouse tumors were detected by immunohistochemistry. Results: TAS-102 significantly inhibited growth and migration of OSCC both in vitro and in vivo. It suppressed the activity of NF-kappa B in cells. TAS-102 down-regulated the expression of p-AKT, VEGF, FGF2 and CD31, which was associated with reduced vascularization of HSC2 tumor lesions. Conclusion: These findings suggest that TAS-102 might inhibit angiogenesis and proliferation of OSCC cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据