4.7 Article

A method for improving the accuracy of calibration-free laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy by exploiting self-absorption

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1183, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.339008

关键词

Calibration-free laser-induced breakdown; spectroscopy; Self-absorption; Columnar density; Standard reference line

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62075069, 62005078, 61575073]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2020JJ5206]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposed a new CF-LIBS method (CD-SRL) utilizing self-absorption effect to directly perform calibration-free analysis, demonstrating higher quantitative accuracy and adaptability compared to traditional CF-LIBS.
The existence of the self-absorption effect results in a nonlinear relationship between spectral intensity and elemental concentration, which dramatically affect the quantitative accuracy of laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), especially calibration-free LIBS (CF-LIBS). In this work, the CF-LIBS with columnar density and standard reference line (CF-LIBS with CD-SRL) was proposed to improve the quantitative accuracy of CF-LIBS analysis by exploiting self-absorption. Our method allows using self-absorbed lines to perform the calibration-free approach directly and does not require selfabsorption correction algorithms. To verify this method, the experiment was conducted both on aluminium-bronze and aluminium alloy samples. Compared with classical CF-LIBS, the average errors (AEs) of CF-LIBS with CD-SRL were decreased from 3.20%, 3.22%, 3.15% and 3.01%-0.95%, 1.00%, 1.16% and 1.78%, respectively for four aluminium-bronze alloy samples. The AEs were decreased from 0.66%, 0.70%, 0.89% and 1.30%-0.43%, 0.61%, 0.77% and 0.33%, respectively for four aluminium alloy samples. The experimental results demonstrated that CF-LIBS with CD-SRL provided higher quantitative accuracy and stronger adaptability than classical CF-LIBS, which is quite helpful for the practical application of CF-LIBS. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据