4.7 Article

Microstructure and microhardness of high entropy alloys with Zn addition: AlCoFeNiZn and AlCoFeNiMoTiZn

期刊

ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 12, 页码 4687-4696

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2021.10.012

关键词

High entropy alloys; Equiatomic multicomponent alloys; Powder metallurgy; Microstructure; Microhardness

资金

  1. CONACYT [701859]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High entropy alloys were designed from equiatomic multicomponent systems using powder metallurgy. Mo-containing systems exhibited the highest microhardness in both milled and sintered conditions, with alloy grain sizes in the nano scale.
High entropy alloys were designed from equiatomic multicomponent systems using powder metallurgy including mechanical alloying and sintering. The structure and morphology of the resulting alloys were characterized by means of X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy techniques and their hardness values were also determined in the Vickers scale. The results indicate under the milling conditions used, the AlCoFeNiZn, AlCoFeNiMoTi and AlCoFeNiMoTiZn alloys crystallized forming BCC structures whereas the AlCoFeNi alloy presented two different phases, one with FCC structure and the other one with BCC. The synthesis method resulted in alloys with grain sizes in the nano scale having values between 4.1 and 9.4 nm on the powder form up to 40.1 nm after sintering phenomenon which lead to phase transformations which were more evident in the Mo-containing alloys. In addition, the AlCoFeNiZn and AlCoFeNiMoTiZn alloys did not show Zn traces after sintering as it was suggested by chemical analyses using energy dispersive spectroscopy, suggesting it is lost by evaporation during sintering process. Mo-containing systems exhibited the highest microhardness in both milled and sintered conditions. (c) 2021 The Society of Powder Technology Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. and The Society of Powder Technology Japan. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据