4.8 Article

Physical Disruption of Solid Tumors by Immunostimulatory Microrobots Enhances Antitumor Immunity

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 33, 期 49, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202103505

关键词

cancer immunotherapy; immunostimulatory microrobots; in situ vaccination; physical destruction

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01CA200574]
  2. Defense Threat Reduction Agency Joint Science and Technology Office for Chemical and Biological Defense [HDTRA1-18-1-0014]
  3. Fulbright grants
  4. Conicyt PFCHA/Doctorado becas Chile [2015-56150011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of immunotherapy with other forms of treatment can enhance antitumor responses. The microrobot-based strategy integrates tumor tissue disruption with biological stimulation to achieve complete tumor regression and education of the host immune system, controlling the growth of distant tumors.
The combination of immunotherapy with other forms of treatment is an emerging strategy for boosting antitumor responses. By combining multiple modes of action, these combinatorial therapies can improve clinical outcomes through unique synergisms. Here, a microrobot-based strategy that integrates tumor tissue disruption with biological stimulation is shown for cancer immunotherapy. The microrobot is fabricated by loading bacterial outer membrane vesicles onto a self-propelling micromotor, which can react with water to generate a propulsion force. When administered intratumorally to a solid tumor, the disruption of the local tumor tissue coupled with the delivery of an immunostimulatory payload leads to complete tumor regression. Additionally, treatment of the primary tumor results in the simultaneous education of the host immune system, enabling it to control the growth of distant tumors. Overall, this work introduces a distinct application of microrobots in cancer immunotherapy and offers an attractive strategy for amplifying cancer treatment efficacy when combined with conventional therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据