4.6 Review

Behavioural programmes for cigarette smoking cessation: investigating interactions between behavioural, motivational and delivery components in a systematic review and component network meta-analysis

期刊

ADDICTION
卷 117, 期 8, 页码 2145-2156

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/add.15791

关键词

behavioural support; counselling; meta-analysis; smoking cessation; systematic review; tobacco addiction

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Complex Reviews Support Unit
  2. NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) Oxford
  3. NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Oxford
  4. NIHR Community Healthcare MedTech and In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative at Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
  5. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  6. Thames Valley at Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of different components of behavioral interventions for cigarette smoking cessation. The findings suggest that behavioral counseling and guaranteed financial incentives are associated with the greatest success in quitting smoking. Adding other effective components may further increase the benefits, with delivery via text message showing particular promise.
Aims To investigate the comparative and combined effectiveness of four types of components of behavioural interventions for cigarette smoking cessation: behavioural (e.g. counselling), motivational (e.g. focus on reasons to quit), delivery mode (e.g. phone) and provider (e.g. nurse). Design Systematic review and component network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials identified from Cochrane reviews. Interventions included behavioural interventions for smoking cessation (including all non-pharmacological interventions, e.g. counselling, exercise, hypnotherapy, self-help materials), compared with another behavioural intervention or no support. Building on a 2021 review (CD013229), we conducted three analyses, investigating: comparative effectiveness of the components, whether models that allowed interactions between components gave different results to models assuming additivity, and predicted effect estimates for combined effects of components that had showed promise but where there were few trials. Setting Community and health-care settings. Participants Adults who smoke tobacco. Measurements Smoking cessation at >= 6 months, preferring sustained, biochemically validated outcomes where available. Findings Three hundred and twelve trials (250 563 participants) were included. Fifty were at high risk of bias using Cochrane risk of bias tool, V1 (ROB1); excluding these studies did not change findings. Head-to-head comparisons of components suggested that support via text message (SMS) compared with telephone (OR 1.48, 95% CrI 1.13-1.94) or print materials (OR 1.44, 95% CrI 1.14-1.83) was more effective, and individual delivery was less effective than delivery as part of a group (OR 0.78, 95% CrI 0.64-0.95). There was no conclusive evidence of synergistic or antagonistic interactions when combining components that were commonly used together. Adding multiple components that are commonly used in behavioural counselling suggested clinically relevant and statistically conclusive evidence of benefit. Components with the largest effects that could be combined, but rarely have been, were estimated to increase the odds of quitting between two and threefold. For example, financial incentives delivered via SMS, with tailoring and a focus on how to quit, had an estimated OR of 2.94 (95% CrI 1.91-4.52). Conclusions Among the components of behavioural support for smoking cessation, behavioural counselling and guaranteed financial incentives are associated with the greatest success. Incorporating additional components associated with effectiveness may further increase benefit, with delivery via text message showing particular promise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据