4.7 Article

Investigation of strengthening mechanisms in an additively manufactured Haynes 230 alloy

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117404

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Haynes 230 Ni superalloy; well-aligned nanoprecipitates; mechanical properties; strengthening mechanism

资金

  1. U.S. Office of Naval Research [N00014-17-1-2087, N00014-16-1-2778]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compares the microstructure and mechanical behavior of as-printed and stress-relieved Haynes 230 Ni alloys prepared by laser powder bed fusion. The research reveals that after stress-relief treatment, nanoprecipitates in the alloy have formed numerous aligned orientation relationships with the matrix.
There are abundant studies on additive manufacturing of Ni alloys, such as Inconel 718. However, the studies on the microstructure and the deformation behavior of solid solution strengthened Ni alloys, such as Haynes 230, are limited. Here we compare the microstructure and the mechanical behavior of as-printed and stress-relieved Haynes 230 Ni alloys prepared by laser powder bed fusion. Transmission electron microscopy analysis revealed M23C6 carbides decorated at the dislocation cell walls in the as-printed material transformed to well-aligned arrays of M6C nanoprecipitates separated by an array spacing of 500 nm after stress-relief (heat treatment). The nanoprecipitates in stress-relieved alloy have formed numerous aligned orientation relationships with the matrix despite their large lattice mismatch. Post-tension microscopy analyses demonstrated high-density dislocation networks in the as-printed samples, whereas high-density stacking faults and nanoscale deformation twins were observed in the stress-relieved counterparts. This study provides insights for understanding the influence of nanoprecipitates on the deformation mechanisms of additively manufactured Ni alloys. (C) 2021 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据