4.8 Article

Extracting the Strain Matrix and Twist Angle from the Moire Superlattice in van der Waals Heterostructures

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 1471-1476

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c09789

关键词

moire superlattice; strain field; nanoimaging; scanning probe microscopy; vdW materials

资金

  1. Programmable Quantum Materials (Pro-QM) programme at Columbia University, an Energy Frontier Research Center [DE-SC0019443]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES) [DE-SC0018426]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-16-1-0601]
  4. Simons Foundation [579913]
  5. Moore Investigator in Quantum Materials [EPIQS 9455]
  6. [ONR-VB: N00014-19-1-263]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article aims to provide a practical tool to extract the strain tensor and twist angle from an experimentally observable pattern. However, extracting these parameters from a spatially varying moire pattern is not straightforward, which is one of the limitations discussed.
When two atomic layers are brought into contact at a relative twist angle, a large-scale pattern, called a moire superlattice, emerges due to the (angular or lattice) mismatch between the layers. This has profound consequences in terms of the Hamiltonian of the system but was also considered in several publications as a means to extract the local strain tensor. While extracting the twist angle based on knowledge of the periodicity of the moire ' is trivial in the case of a regular moire pattern, in many examples in the literature, that is not the case. In particular, extracting the strain tensor and twist angle maps from a spatially varying moire pattern is not straightforward. This article aims to provide a practical tool to extract the strain tensor and twist angle from an experimentally observable pattern. It further addresses the limitation of any such approach in the absence of additional experimental information beyond the moire superlattice pattern.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据