4.3 Article

Distinct roles of hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex in spatial and nonspatial memory

期刊

HIPPOCAMPUS
卷 26, 期 12, 页码 1515-1524

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22652

关键词

working memory; long-term memory; path integration; spatial alternation; odor alternation

资金

  1. Medical Research Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs
  2. NIH [T32MH020002, T32AG000216]
  3. NSF [1120395]
  4. NIMH [24600]
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1120395] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In earlier work, patients with hippocampal damage successfully path integrated, apparently by maintaining spatial information in working memory. In contrast, rats with hippocampal damage were unable to path integrate, even when the paths were simple and working memory might have been expected to support performance. We considered possible ways to understand these findings. We tested rats with either hippocampal lesions or lesions of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) on three tasks of spatial or nonspatial memory: path integration, spatial alternation, and a nonspatial alternation task. Rats with mPFC lesions were impaired on both spatial and nonspatial alternation but performed normally on path integration. By contrast, rats with hippocampal lesions were impaired on path integration and spatial alternation but performed normally on nonspatial alternation. We propose that rodent neocortex is limited in its ability to construct a coherent spatial working memory of complex environments. Accordingly, in tasks such as path integration and spatial alternation, working memory cannot depend on neocortex alone. Rats may accomplish many spatial memory tasks by relying on long-term memory. Alternatively, they may accomplish these tasks within working memory through sustained coordination between hippocampus and other cortical brain regions such as mPFC, in the case of spatial alternation, or parietal cortex in the case of path integration. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据